Home arrow Workshops arrow Treviso arrow Conclusions
Conclusions PDF Print E-mail


Conclusions of the workshop - Treviso (Quality Assurance in Freshwater Aquaculture)


This workshop had a particular focus on quality and freshwater aquaculture, underlining the application of standards and quality assurance.
A very comprehensive review was made on quality requirements of the consumer and how the quality of aquaculture products was subject to many influencing factors.

A.         RTD (Practical)

  • Pikeperch and perch have potential opportunity, but
    • Year-round production of eggs and larvae needs resolving
    • Special diets needed for broodstock (big influence)
  • Future fish feeds have a direct effect on fish farming
    • Improving feed efficiency while reducing dependency from marine raw materials
    • To what extent are vegetable raw materials suitable for freshwater fish feeds?
    • Develop aquaculture to be a net protein producer
  • Future feeds may not be able to avoid GM
    • Needs new approaches and communication to succeed
    • Need to change approach from commodity use to incorporation of strategic ingredients that serve a purpose (fish and human nutrition/benefits)
  • Lifestyle diseases are a global challenge
    • Many directly affected by an improved diet where fish/seafood has important role
    • New fish diets can act as functional food but
      • The public has been presented with conflicting scientific evidence regarding the risks and benefits of consuming various types of fish
      • The assessment and management of food safety in general tends to be a politically and morally charged issue
      • This highlights the need to develop effective risk communication about farmed fish
  • Genomics/Genetics: Breeding efficiency is best achieved in the long term
    •  sustained effort and support necessary for success
    • Can have undesirable side effects on fitness traits
      • have to be monitored and genetic basis explored
  • « Genetic pollution » of wild stocks with escapees needs clarification
    •  Is it worse than with non-selected stocks?
    • Option of containment with sterile (triploid) fish 

B.         Managerial/Commercial

  • Quality is closely linked to safety
    • Post-mortem influences on quality v. important cf. quality pre-harvest (spoilage)
    • Need BMP linked to risk analysis systems to have clear safety objectives and standards
  • Quality Assurance schemes  are a definite advantage – industry has to set and lead the trend (vs. being dictated to) – ownership of standard is important
    • QA reduces risks, improves performance, increases autonomy

C.          Social/Political

  • Association provide essential hub with Government/Agencies/Organisations
    • Promote BMP and Codes of Practise/Quality Schemes
    • Need better communication tools and support – transparency of operation essential
  • Licensing issues highlighted as being very complex for freshwater aquaculture, following regionalisation, noting
    • Diversity of local, regional and state authorisation procedures
    • Complexity of bureaucracy and procedures
    • Need for simplification and common rules
  • Support needed to develop new projects (activities, investment, equipment)
    • Procedures lengthy & complicated, one-stop shop could help
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 25 November 2009 )