Conclusions of the seminar - Athens (Mediterranean Aquaculture)
A. RTD (Practical)
- Mediterranean sustainability guidelines seen as an important document
- Need to bring these into reality & practise (new Code? Certifiable?)
- Fish Health – major topic
- Need: epidemiological studies
- Need: practical stress/best welfare indicators
- Need: best husbandry practises
- Need: strategies for combating viral diseases
- Research needed on fast-growing species & improved performance of established ones (selection criteria and methodology? Genetics? – no clear suggestions)
- Deformities remains a big issue for Mediterranean hatcheries
- Trend of fewer but larger hatcheries
- Need: Uniform diagnostics
- Concern raised with regard to the omega 3 level of fish fed with substituted ingredients in the feed (i.e. substitution would lead to a weaker nutrient profile of fish – less acceptable to consumer)
- Research in the direction of identifying genetic strains of fish that are more susceptible or welcoming to feed substitution (components) was mentioned as an important issue.
- Production of biolipid and bioproteins from natural gas was proposed as a possible alternative source of feed ingredient substitutes
- Lessons to be learnt from the salmonid industry with regard to treatment and health management of the fish stock. (networking/crossover)
B. Managerial/Commercial
- Consumer studies on drivers/barriers (Seafood Plus) – limited awareness of aquaculture
- Better marketing, more consumer information needed
- Communication needs improvement
- Potential for ‘new species’ not clear
- Proactive rather than reactive approach required in fish health management
- The promotion of organic fish in the market must be done in a cautious and responsible manner as not to harm the image of the ‘conventionally’ produced fish.
- Within the issue of image of the industry and its products, the need of common eu labelling standards was stresses by a number of speakers and participants.
C. Social/Political
- Long standing issues of importance must be supported by policy makers – licensing, spatial planning, support & guidance to RTD (spatial planning a regular topic)
- Site selection and carrying capacity needs support data
- Clearer position on MPAs and aquaculture potential needed
- Marine policy could play an important role here
- Constructive cooperation between producers and relevant stakeholders must be established
- Potential need for an aquaculture observatory (to follow developments)
- Aquaculture should be an equal rights user (point comes back regularly)
- Need: Better Coordination of RTD – quantifiable objectives, efficient evaluation mechanisms (of results)
- Key factor remains communication by explaining sustainability (a better choice)
- The issue of access to research funds was raised, along with the problem of limited funding capacities for SMEs (and Associations under FP7 rules)
- Everyone stressed the fact that demand for fish will increase and that capture fisheries cannot supply the market. Aquaculture is here to fill the market gap with high quality products
- Mediterranean aquaculture has an important role to play in the wider European aquaculture environment.
|
|
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 24 November 2009 )
|